Showing posts with label standardized testing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label standardized testing. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Grading Parents: How a Florida Law Highlights Exactly What is Wrong With Education

I can hear the comments from teachers now:

"This is the greatest law ever!"
"YEAH!  It's about time we make parents responsible!"

A Florida representative recently proposed a bill that would require kindergarten through third grade teachers to grade their students' parents.  This is a teachers' dream.  

Why?  Our experiences tell us our students' success is directly  correlated to their home life, which is correlated with parental involvement.  As involvement goes up, achievement goes up.  Increasing parental involvement makes a better student, generally speaking.

So why is this a bad idea?  

It's another example of the system's failures being blamed on something besides the system itself.  Teachers administrators, school boards, curriculum, textbooks, lack of technology, and a myriad of other cogs in the machine of education have been blamed for the failures of public education.  

We've taken dramatic steps to change these elements, usually by "making them more accountable".  Has it worked?  Not according to this article.  

It doesn't take a sociology PhD to understand what is happening.  Our government is "raising the bar" by increasing graduation requirements and adding punitive consequences to high-stakes standardized tests.  This sounds like a great idea... on paper.

In reality, no amount of money, programs, teacher expertise, or curriculum is going to significantly change student ability.  We measure student success by a shockingly narrow range of ability and very specific skills.  A good percentage of our society simply does not excel at those specific measures of "ability."  

Since schools are being judged on things like graduation rates, they begin to cut corners to artificially increase graduation rates.  What's the alternative?  The laws don't give schools an alternative.

What's worse than the kids graduating with a watered-down degree?  The kids that fall through the cracks.  The laws require schools to continually increase test scores and graduation rates.  Most of this can be done by lowering standards, thus inflating grades.  Still, some kids can't hack even that level.  What do we do with these kids?  We get rid of them by tagging them as "behavior problems" and shipping them to alternative schools or expelling them altogether.

This Florida bill simply shifts some of the blame to parents.  Is it their fault their kid is better at drawing than long division?  And will this bill somehow change that?

The problem is obvious.  School policies are being determined by politicians that have little or no understanding of actual human behavior in general, and the inner-workings of the process of educating children in particular.  
The solution is equally obvious.  We need to stop treating kids like numbered cattle.  We need to stop assuming we can treat children like machines where inputting "X" will result in "Y" results.  We need to treat each and every child like the individual they are.  We need to create an environment where their individual talents can blossom.  We need to foster creativity, critical thinking, and the intrinsic love of learning through exploration and discovery.  We need to abandon this dumb-ass idea of "accountability", stop blaming parents, students, teachers, administrators, and other groups indiscriminately, and refocus our priorities.  

What we are doing does not work.  Doing more of it is just plain stupid.  

###

Monday, November 15, 2010

It's Not The Test That's Biased, Damn It!

I have several pet peeves as a teacher.  One major pet peeve is the fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of tests.  Let's use the ACT as an example.  

Note- I am not arguing about actually using the test... generally I feel standardized testing is one of the major problems of the education system.  We'll save that argument for another day. 

Back to the ACT.  Critics often charge the test is biased, usually racially.  They point to the fact that racial minorities score lower than white test takers.  Their conclusion- the test is biased!

The ACT is a carefully crafted test.  It is meant to measure students' aptitude for college-level work.  This is directly from the ACT site:

"These tests are designed to assess students' general educational development and their ability to complete college-level work."

 The test is developed by professional test developers.  It is meticulously designed to be both reliable and valid.  It asses students' abilities to succeed in college.  Indeed, higher ACT scores are correlated with higher first-year GPA in college.  The test measures what it is supposed to measure.

If the test measures what it measures, why do racial minorities score lower?  Ready for this one- the system is biased, not the tests that measure the system.  That's right.  WE'RE THE PROBLEM, NOT THE TEST!  

Our entire education system is set up by white relatively affluent decision-makers.  It should be no surprise white relatively affluent students fare well under the system.  Any other group, whether that group is a racial minority or a different socioeconomic group, will not do as well. 

The test doesn't have to change.  In fact, the test cannot change.  Changing the test would simply ignore the obvious- if we want to put an end to discrepancies in test scores, we need to fix the underlying system that caused the inequitable scores in the first place. 

Why is that so difficult?  Logistics aside, it requires us to face a truth we don't like to face- all of us have biases.  Don't believe me?  Check this out.  It affects how we teach.  Until we admit that to ourselves, no amount of test tweaking or school reform will fix the achievement gap as measured by standardized tests.